in house dollar bill thumbnail
 Total: 43,017 books
 New: 161 books




small login logo

Please enter your details to login and enjoy all the fun of the fair!

Not a member? Join us here. Everything is FREE and ALWAYS will be.

Forgotten your login details? No problem, you can get your password back here.

Warren Magazines on Archive.org

Pages: [1]

topic icon Author Topic: Warren Magazines on Archive.org  (Read 10963 times)

Alessandro Bottero

message icon
Warren Magazines on Archive.org
« on: April 23, 2014, 01:23:52 PM »

hi all. i require your help to clarify something which puzzles me. in the summer of 2013 Archive.org started hosting a lot of Warren publications Magazines (Vampirella, Creepy, Eerie, 1984).
we all know Archive.org is a site which host public domain contents, so i was amazed to see it. as far i know Warren publications  went bankruptcy in 1985, Harris comics acquired the rights of it's library (less Famous monster of Filmland) and then Jim Warren re-acquired the rights in 1992 of the characters (less Vampirella).

since summer of 2013 no one has complained with Archive.org about the Warren Magazines, and they are still there, and everyone can download them.

Does anyone know if this is the same thing happened with Quality/DC Comics, when DC acquired the property og the characters, but the quality  books were the characters was shown were left in public domain?

what i means its: does anyone knows if the CONCRETE magazine issues are in PD, even if the characters are copyrighted?

ip icon Logged

MarkWarner

  • Administrator
message icon
Re: Warren Magazines on Archive.org
« Reply #1 on: April 23, 2014, 02:17:31 PM »

Hi Alessandro!

Well this is a raw nerve with me! As far as I am concerned Archive.org has A LOT of copyrighted material. They have this "reputation" as being good guys with only Public Domain material .... but just take a minute and you'll find stuff that shouldn't be there ... .. searching for Batman was quite illuminating .. not sure if they have done anything about that.

Back to the books you mentioned I looked at one ...it had a valid 1967 copyright notice on it. SO IT IS NOT PUBLIC DOMAIN! Now it may be orphaned and now one cares about it .. BUT the fact remains it is copyrighted and not PD. And unless it is there by agreement of the copyright holder it should not be there.

This applies to huge areas of the site ... and boy I am also so surprised they don't get done for trademark violations.
ip icon Logged

narfstar

  • Administrator
message icon
Re: Warren Magazines on Archive.org
« Reply #2 on: April 23, 2014, 02:54:39 PM »

Warren material is not even orphaned.  Some have given up the fight against digital and others consider it a form of advertising. I do not know about the Warren material but it can not be carried here unless we had authorization from the copyright holders.
ip icon Logged

Alessandro Bottero

message icon
Re: Warren Magazines on Archive.org
« Reply #3 on: April 23, 2014, 03:21:16 PM »

do you know if the same can be said for skywald and eerie publications?
ip icon Logged

narfstar

  • Administrator
message icon
Re: Warren Magazines on Archive.org
« Reply #4 on: June 24, 2014, 01:09:18 AM »

The reprints in Skywald were from PD comics but the new material is copyright.
ip icon Logged

profh0011

  • Global Moderator
message icon
Re: Warren Magazines on Archive.org
« Reply #5 on: October 17, 2014, 12:30:27 AM »

This reminds me, just the other day I got a package of comics in the mail from a publisher I've done some coloring work for.  After a quick glance, I e-mailed him to let him knoiw a couple of the books did not have any indicias-- no copyright or trademark notices anywhere!  I know you no longer HAVE to register with the Ciopyright Office in Washington for something to be considered Copyrighted-- it's now mostly a formailty, but one that may help enforce ownership in case a lawsuit ever erupts.  But to NOT have a Copyright notice posted anywhere on the work... that CAN'T be right!!!
ip icon Logged

MarkWarner

  • Administrator
message icon
Re: Warren Magazines on Archive.org
« Reply #6 on: October 17, 2014, 01:18:05 PM »

Again you don't need to put a copyright on BUT it is highly recommended and stops any confusion. PLUS if there is a valid copyright notice and it goes to court a plea of ignorance when it comes to damages cannot be made. But no copyright notice gives the court more discretion. That is not speculation, I read it the other day on some US govt .pdf
ip icon Logged

profh0011

  • Global Moderator
message icon
Re: Warren Magazines on Archive.org
« Reply #7 on: October 18, 2014, 07:39:53 PM »

I've sent enough packages to the Copyright Office in Washington to know they've made changes over the years.  For example, long ago, you actually had to PUBLISH something, and register it with the Office, for it to be "Copyrighted".  Byt by the time I got involved, you could register an entire package of related "unpublished" material.

These days, you don't even have to send things in, but it's still a good idea if you can afford it.  (The rates have gone up...)
ip icon Logged

nuelow

message icon
Re: Warren Magazines on Archive.org
« Reply #8 on: November 30, 2015, 07:05:22 PM »

I hope it's okay to revive an old thread, because the topic has relevance to a project I'm working on....


The reprints in Skywald were from PD comics but the new material is copyright.


I've been researching the Skywald magazines, and they APPEAR to be in the public domain due to the same technicality that put the early Charlton comics into the public domain.

The ownership statements in "Psycho," "Nightmare," and "Scream" do not contain the word Copyright (or an abbreviation) anywhere. The pre-1978 law clearly states that word must be present in some form, and it is nowhere to be found in the Skywald magazines. (The Copyright symbol was optional until 1978, but not the word itself.)

Is there something I've overlooked regarding the Skywald Magazines? Was there a renewal after the '78 law change that i missed? I consider myself knowledgeable in these matters and a skilled researcher, but I am not at the level of you folks in these parts, so now I'm doubting my conclusions and findings.

Now, I agree that some of the covers appear to be been properly copyrighted to individual artists, but this does not appear to be the case of the content.

Help? :)
ip icon Logged
Pages: [1]
 

Comic Book Plus In-House Image
Mission and Disclaimer: The mission of Comic Book Plus is to present completely free of charge, and to the widest possible audience, popular cultural works of the past. These records are offered as a contribution to education and lifelong learning. They are historical documents reflecting the attitudes, perspectives, and beliefs of different times. We at Comic Book Plus do not endorse the views expressed in these, which may contain content offensive to modern users.

We aim to house only content in the Public Domain. If you suspect that any of our material may be infringing copyright, then please use our contact page to let us know. So we can investigate further.