in house dollar bill thumbnail
Comic Book Plus In-House Image
 Total: 43,551 books
 New: 85 books




small login logo

Please enter your details to login and enjoy all the fun of the fair!

Not a member? Join us here. Everything is FREE and ALWAYS will be.

Forgotten your login details? No problem, you can get your password back here.

Watcha Watchin'?

Pages: 1 ... 57 58 [59] 60 61 ... 137

topic icon Author Topic: Watcha Watchin'?  (Read 738116 times)

paw broon

  • Administrator
message icon
Re: Watcha Watchin'?
« Reply #1450 on: October 31, 2012, 03:39:12 PM »

The Walking Dead just made me laugh, the bits I saw.  And vampire stuff just passes me by - don't get it.  but if you're going to have a zombie show, surely you need zombies and some voodoo?
Saw the 2nd. ep. of Arrow and now I'm intrigued to find out what happened on the island.
Elementary, well, the guy makes me shudder when I see those tattoos - personal taste. 
Last ever New Tricks? and the BBC switched the last 2 eps. around because of the Savile scandal, I think.  So what should have been the penultimate part with Gerry and Steve working in Glasgow became the finale and there was a very different feel to the episode.  What happens now?  Haven't a clue.
ip icon Logged

profh0011

  • Global Moderator
message icon
Re: Watcha Watchin'?
« Reply #1451 on: October 31, 2012, 09:14:24 PM »

McCLOUD:  GIVE MY REGRETS TO BROADWAY
Bullets On Broadway     *****

*** This review may contain spoilers ***

The night Sam swaps duty with another officer (he wanted to see the football game, which did not thrill his date Chris Caughlin one bit), the man who took his place gets killed during a "routine" investigation. Sam, feeling guilty ("It should have been me!") gets depressed and begins to think maybe it's time he went back home to Taos.

But then he receives an anonymous note indicating the killing wasn't random, and wasn't an accident. Before long, he's looking into it, and discovers that Det. Arthur Franz, who'd been investigating Broadway producer Malcolm Garnett, abruptly closed the file on the case, shortly before his daughter was offered the lead in Garnett's next show. VERY suspicious!

The trail also leads to Louise Blanchard, an apparently wealthy widow whose husband was swindled by Garnett. She seems very nice on the surface, and appears to find Sam very attractive... until we find out that she's also having an affair with Julian Franco, the man suspected of KILLING Det. Franz! Before this complex web plays out, nearly everyone involved winds up being guilty of something, whether it's bribery or conspiracy to commit murder.

Topping the guest cast this time out is Milton Berle as "Malcolm Garnett". Though famous as a comedian, Berle has repeatedly proved over the years he can do straight drama as well, and be very convincing at it. Barbara Rush (PEYTON PLACE) is "Louise Blanchard"; Rush reminds me a bit of a 60's version of Dana Delany, in that I rank her as one of the most beautiful women in Hollywood, but she always seems to be playing very disturbed or corrupt characters (as seen in her guest-shots on THE OUTER LIMITS, BATMAN, or here). Arthur Mallet (YOUNG FRANKENSTEIN, HALLOWEEN, a guest-shot on WKRP IN CINCINNATI) is "Leonard", one of Louise's rich friends who married a wife much younger than he is. Reginald Owen (whose career goes back decades) is "Orville", another of Louise's friends. Vic Tayback (STAR TREK: "A Piece of the Action") is "Thomas", Garnett's bodyguard. Jeff Pomerantz (founder of "Hollywood Says No To Drugs") is "Julian Franco", the painter-sculptor boy-toy of Louise who looks like a porn star and is easily talked into committing murders for her. Lane Bradbury (several episodes of GUNSMOKE and a long list of other credits) is "Carol Harrington", the sweet, talented dancer who's shocked to learn her father may have accepted a bribe to get her a career break. (She was also the wife of actor-turned-director Lou Antonio, who helmed this episode.)

Between the film montage of McCloud roaming around NYC to the tune of Dennis Weaver warbling the song "Another Way", the scenes at the beginning and end of Sam & Chris having dinner together, and an extended "rehearsal" sequence in the theatre, this episode feels very much to me like it was written for the one-hour format of the previous year, but painfully padded out to fit the 90-min. slot.

Also, while the climax, with Sam getting the drop on a killer who was waiting to take him out, was clever, with the 2 main plots, both of which end in rather downbeat fashion, this episode may be my least-favorite of the season. Oh well. Things would change-- BIG-time-- the following year.
ip icon Logged

Yoc

  • VIP & JVJ Project Member
message icon
Re: Watcha Watchin'?
« Reply #1452 on: November 05, 2012, 02:32:55 AM »

I got hooked on Walking Dead right from the first homage to 28 Day Later (well, they claimed they did it before they saw the film but really?)
Anyways, Mark, as the advertising says somewhere - the monsters of Walking Dead of the live ones.  The zombies are more like some long horrible plague that can kill anyone at any time.
This season seems to be focused on the Woodbury plot which was very controversial when done in the comics.  'The Governor' of this town is one seriously nasty guy!  I notice the tv show has again decided to change things from the comic giving us a Caucasian as the Gov and so far made him almost sympathetic until the last shot of ep3.
I lump Walking Dead in with some of the best tv going on out there these days.  After season 1 I started reading the comic and just this month caught up with the current issue.  The comic is almost as good as the tv show but not quite.  Just IMO.  Haven't had a chance to read either of the novels which are also set in Woodbury.
ip icon Logged

Roygbiv666

  • VIP
message icon
Re: Watcha Watchin'?
« Reply #1453 on: November 05, 2012, 08:54:28 PM »

Cool, I've seen lots of negative reviews, but now i'll break into my Season Two BD pack.


I got hooked on Walking Dead right from the first homage to 28 Day Later (well, they claimed they did it before they saw the film but really?)
Anyways, Mark, as the advertising says somewhere - the monsters of Walking Dead of the live ones.  The zombies are more like some long horrible plague that can kill anyone at any time.
This season seems to be focused on the Woodbury plot which was very controversial when done in the comics.  'The Governor' of this town is one seriously nasty guy!  I notice the tv show has again decided to change things from the comic giving us a Caucasian as the Gov and so far made him almost sympathetic until the last shot of ep3.
I lump Walking Dead in with some of the best tv going on out there these days.  After season 1 I started reading the comic and just this month caught up with the current issue.  The comic is almost as good as the tv show but not quite.  Just IMO.  Haven't had a chance to read either of the novels which are also set in Woodbury.
ip icon Logged

josemas

  • VIP & JVJ Project Member
message icon
Re: Watcha Watchin'?
« Reply #1454 on: November 12, 2012, 02:06:49 AM »

A quick listing of feature films watched since the middle of summer.

Quick Millions (1931), Horrible Bosses (2011), Attack of the Crab Monsters (1957), Keoma (1976), Tombstone (1942), Out of Reach (2004), The Naked Kiss (1964), My Bloody Valentine (2009), The Girl Next Door (1953), City of Fear (1959), Hobo with a Shotgun (2011), The Lost Express (1926), Right at Your Door (2006), The Cotton Club (1964), Crocodile (2000), How to Make a Monster (1958), Not of this Earth (1958), War of the Satellites (1958), Francis the Talking Mule (1949), McFadden's Flats (1935), Frankenstein and the Monster from Hell (1974), Executioners from Shaolin (1977), The Nickel Ride (1975), The Avenging Eagle (1978), The Last Performance (1929), Lonesome (1928), The History Boys (2006), Everything Must Go (2011), Down on the Farm (1920), Golden Earrings (1947), Mission Impossible: Ghost Protocol (2011), Commandos Strike at Dawn (1943), The Fighting Kentuckian (1949), The Cheat (1931), Little Big Soldier (2010), Harpoon: Whale Watching Massacre (2009), Highway 13 (1948), Jonah Hex (2010), Things Happen at Night (1948), Five Shaolin Masters (1974), Demon Hunting (2007), Wind Chill (2007), Kaw (2007), Somewhere in Sonora (1933), The Master (2012), Def by Temptation (1990), The T.A.M.I. Show (1964), Battlestar Galactica: Razor (2007), The Crucifer of Blood (1991), The Man with the Iron Fists (2012).

Just as an eclectic bunch as usual.

Best

Joe
ip icon Logged

moondood

message icon
Re: Watcha Watchin'?
« Reply #1455 on: November 12, 2012, 05:21:50 AM »

profh0011, neat factoids on Halloween, Phantom of the Opera, etc...you have a better eye than I do on that stuff.

Just watched a documentary on Halloween on youtube--and it had PJ talking about her topless scene.  They shot it several times until she went topless, but she didn't explain if it was for the TV version or not.  Knowing Carpenter's attitude at the time, most likely not.  The success of it took him completely by surprise....though maybe he banked on it going to TV "someday"....almost everything does, after all.

Kurt Hathaway
khathawayart@gmail.com
ip icon Logged

moondood

message icon
Re: Watcha Watchin'?
« Reply #1456 on: November 12, 2012, 05:27:07 AM »

I've been heavy into westerns lately--mostly the B variety..and I can catch the Roy Rogers show on WHT, I think it is.  Gene Autry TV shows I can find online.  But for some reason I can't find any Hopalong Cassidy TV shows online.  So, I broke down and bought the complete TV show set on ebay--about 26 bucks, I think.  72 episodes.  Seen only 2 of his films, but he's got something going as a cowboy star.  On disc 2 of 6 now...and while the show has its low-budget shortcomings, it's interesting to see how several of the episodes have a semi-gothic approach in the story.  Enjoyable show.

Kurt Hathaway
khathawayart@gmail.com
ip icon Logged

narfstar

  • Administrator
message icon
Re: Watcha Watchin'?
« Reply #1457 on: November 12, 2012, 10:35:49 AM »

I can not say that I have seen any of the Hoppy TV show. Have you watched Judge Roy Beane? Obscure little show about a pretty famous character, that I really liked.
ip icon Logged

profh0011

  • Global Moderator
message icon
Re: Watcha Watchin'?
« Reply #1458 on: November 12, 2012, 02:40:37 PM »

"The Crucifer of Blood (1991)"

I've got 3 different versions of THE SIGN OF FOUR on tape. Last year, I watched all 3 back-to-back, just for real comparison' sake.

The Charlton Heston version starts in India, then continues in England, and they make some extensive changes to the plot.

The Jeremy Brett version follows the book, so most of it is a complete mystery, with the flashback to India and the full explanation coming at the end.

My favorite is the Ian Richardson version, which begins with the death of Major Sholto (Thorley Walters). Someone online complained that since the audience saw so much as it happened, it wasn't such a mystery when Holmes got to the scene, but I still think it was very cleverly structured and told. They also added some action sequences at the fair grounds, and, frankly, the climactic boat chase was MUCH more exciting. For whatever reason, the 2 2-parters they did that one year with Jeremy Brett (SIGN OF FOUR and HOUND) were both TERRIBLY-done, but fanatics of the books keep insisting they're the "best". Most authentic adaptations, maybe, but to me, almost unwatchable.

I really wish Sy Weintraub had done all 6 films he planned with Richardson, instead of just the 2 he did.
ip icon Logged

Captain Audio

  • VIP
message icon
Re: Watcha Watchin'?
« Reply #1459 on: November 13, 2012, 06:52:12 AM »

I've watched the Basil Rathbone "Hound of the Baskervilles" recently, and its a very well done film for its day.
I liked the Jeremy Bret version a bit more, but its not because it was more entertaining.
The Hammer films version is also very nicely done.
I don't think I've ever seen a poorly done film of this story.


I caught an episode of "Hopalong Cassidy" on the local retro TV channel a couple of days ago.

One thing I really like about Hoppy is that he can be holding a civilized discussion and if things aren't going his way that Colt Peacemaker simply appears in his hand as if it had always been there. It seems like he moves faster than the old style motion picture cameras can capture. You never see him move his hand to his side, its just suddenly there with a cocked pistol pointed at the bad guy.
ip icon Logged

profh0011

  • Global Moderator
message icon
Re: Watcha Watchin'?
« Reply #1460 on: November 13, 2012, 02:22:56 PM »

My favorite versions of HOUND are (purely in chronological order)...

Basil Rathbone
Peter Cushing
Tom Baker
Ian Richardson

Baker has the BEST script, but also the lowest budget (well that figures). Cushing is the most "different", but in its way is highly entertaining.  I tend to think Rathbone is probably the best "movie", though Richardson is a close 2nd to that.




Avoid at all costs the Peter Cook-Dudley Moore film. It is an abomination beyond all belief.
ip icon Logged

paw broon

  • Administrator
message icon
Re: Watcha Watchin'?
« Reply #1461 on: November 13, 2012, 08:11:32 PM »

Up to a wee while ago I would have agreed with the Rathbone version being the best but after watching Sherlock, The Hounds of Baskerville, I have had to reconsider.  Might need further watches but it was very good.
ip icon Logged
Comic Book Plus In-House Image

profh0011

  • Global Moderator
message icon
Re: Watcha Watchin'?
« Reply #1462 on: November 15, 2012, 02:07:21 AM »

The last couple days...

MY DARLING CLEMENTINE
GUNFIGHT AT THE O.K. CORRAL


I got these about 15 years ago on the same tape.  I always like to watch them back-to-back.
ip icon Logged

profh0011

  • Global Moderator
message icon
Re: Watcha Watchin'?
« Reply #1463 on: November 16, 2012, 02:08:03 AM »

Tonight:

WYATT EARP:  RETURN TO TOMBSTONE (1994)

w/ Hugh O'Brien !!!  (IN COLOR)
ip icon Logged

josemas

  • VIP & JVJ Project Member
message icon
Re: Watcha Watchin'?
« Reply #1464 on: November 16, 2012, 02:51:47 AM »

Henry,

If you ever get a chance check out the 1942 version of Tombstone with Richard Dix as Wyatt Earp.  We watched it at one of my weekly Movie Nights a month or two back.  An interesting take on the legend.

Best

Joe
ip icon Logged

josemas

  • VIP & JVJ Project Member
message icon
Re: Watcha Watchin'?
« Reply #1465 on: November 16, 2012, 02:56:17 AM »

This talk of the various versions of The Hound of the Baskervilles got me wondering if Peter Cushing was the only actor to play Holmes in two different versions of the story- (the 1959 Hammer film and the 1968 television adaptation).

Curious

Joe
ip icon Logged

profh0011

  • Global Moderator
message icon
Re: Watcha Watchin'?
« Reply #1466 on: November 16, 2012, 07:42:44 PM »

Thanks for the tip about the 1942 film.  There's tons of stuff out there I've never seen and would love to, including so many multiple versions of some stories.

I have 6 versions of the "OK Corral" story on tape, and thought for once it would be fun to watch all 6 back-to-back.  The perverse thing is, 2 of them are episodes of science-fiction shows!

I've never seen the Hammer HOLMES tv series (it ran 2 seasons, 3 years apart-- the first with Douglas Wilmer, the 2nd with Peter Cushing, both with Nigel Stock) but hope to someday.  The few Cushing episodes still in existence have been put out on DVD, and in the back of my mind it's one of the things I'd like to get when I finally start working again.

Sean Connery played James Bond in 2 different versions of THUNDERBALL-- the 1965 film and the remake, NEVER SAY NEVER AGAIN.

Frank Finlay was Inspector Lestrade in both A STUDY IN TERROR and MURDER BY DECREE.  While very different stories, both dealt with Jack The Ripper!  (Doesn't that figure? They have the same actor playing the part in 2 different movies, but there's no way they can be considered in the same "universe".)

On the other hand, there's been a number of instances where an actor has appeared in more than one version of a story, but, in different roles.  John Ireland was in both MY DARLING CLEMENTINE and GUNFIGHT AT THE OK CORRAL.  DeForest Kelley was n both GUNFIGHT... and the STAR TREK episode "Spectre of the Gun".
ip icon Logged

Roygbiv666

  • VIP
message icon
Re: Watcha Watchin'?
« Reply #1467 on: November 16, 2012, 07:45:02 PM »

Yeah, that was pretty cool. I prefer Murder by Decree, despite its emotional Holmes


Frank Finlay was Inspector Lestrade in both A STUDY IN TERROR and MURDER BY DECREE.  While very different stories, both dealt with Jack The Ripper!  (Doesn't that figure? They have the same actor playing the part in 2 different movies, but there's no way they can be considered in the same "universe".)
ip icon Logged

profh0011

  • Global Moderator
message icon
WYATT EARP week
« Reply #1468 on: November 17, 2012, 03:43:10 AM »

Once again, I find myself watching a set of westerns.  As it happens, I have 6 different versions of the "OK Corral" story, and for the first time, I decided to dig them out and watch all 6 back-to-back.

    I started out with MY DARLING CLEMENTINE, directed by John Ford, and starring Henry Fonda, Victor Mature, Tim Holt, and Walter Brennen.

    Next up-- on the same tape (I got both of these for my Dad), GUNFIGHT AT THE OK CORRAL, directed by John Sturges, and starring Burt Lancaster, Kirk Douglas, Rhonda Fleming, Martin Milner, DeForest Kelley, Whit Bissell and others.

    Last night, I watched the 1994 tv-film, WYATT EARP: RETURN TO TOMBSTONE.  This is a bizarre concoction.  They took 4 of the last episodes of THE LIFE AND TIMES OF WYATT EARP tv series starring Hugh O'Brien, colorinzed them, severely edited them to speed up the plot transitions, spliced them together and then added a framing sequence in 1914 starring the 1994 version of Hugh O'Brien, who's relating events of 35 years earlier.  The story in this is more complicated than usual, and due to the severe editing job, some of it is not that easy to follow.  Someone suggested it would be better if they just reissued the entire series.  I noted at the IMDB that after around 225 episodes, the OK Corral storyline was apparently the grand finale of the entire series.  Oddly enough, the actual gunfight was the most historically accurate ever done, until the movie TOMBSTONE came along (and the film WYATT EARP 6 months after that).

    Tonight:  THE GUNFIGHTERS, with William Hartnell.  Would you believe?  This is the first time I've ever pulled a lone Hartnell DOCTOR WHO story out of the set to watch by itself.  I had a big smile on my face the whole time.  There's 2 Gerry Anderson veterans in this-- Shane Rimmer as one of the bad guys, and David Graham as "Charlie" the bartender, using the same "Walter Brennen" accent he had on FIREBALL XL5 !

    I notice, checking the IMDB, that John Alderson, who played Wyatt Earp in this, while born in England, appeared in a ton of American TV shows all thru the 60's.  It looks like they got him back to England just for this story!

    Anthony Jacobs, who played Doc Holliday, I've only ever seen in one other thing, an episode of THE SAINT.  He's quite a "character" as Doc, and reminds me a bit of American actor Hans Conreid (but with a different accent).

    I don't know too many of the actors in this, but Laurence Payne, who played Johnny Ringo, was apparently one of the better-known in England.  I see he played one of the main characters, the scientist Dastari, in THE TWO DOCTORS, with Colin Baker, Nicola Bryant, Patrick Troughton, Fraser Hines & Jacqueline Pearce.  That was one of my favorites from that season.


    Tomorrow night (if I can find it)-- "Spectre of the Gun" with William Shatner as not really Ike Clanton and Ron Soble as no doubt the most cold-blooded, murderous Wyatt Earp ever seen on film.  (Soble was apparently a regular on the western series THE MONROES during 1966-67, playing a character named "Dirty Jim".)

    Finally, the climax of this mini-marathon will be TOMBSTONE with Kurt Russell.  Saw that in a theatre when it came out, was totally blown away by it.  I also saw WYATT EARP with Kevin Costner 6 months later, but didn't care for it as much.  Reportedly it's much closer to history, but at every point where the 2 pictures tell the same events, Costner comes across as an unlikeable bastard, while in the same circumstances Kurt Russell comes across as flawed yet heroic.  In this case, I prefer "Hollywood" to "History".
ip icon Logged

profh0011

  • Global Moderator
message icon
Re: Watcha Watchin'?
« Reply #1469 on: November 17, 2012, 03:46:37 AM »


Yeah, that was pretty cool. I prefer Murder by Decree, despite its emotional Holmes


I saw MURDER BY DECREE when it came out.  Cool film. A STUDY IN TERROR took a bit of adjustment. However, after all these years, I watched both back-to-back recently, and found that I liked the earlier one better now.  Must be all those actors I recognize from other things, or the general style it was shot in, or something.

While I probably first saw Frank Finlay in THE THREE MUSKETEERS, I think my favorite role of his these days is Professor Van Helsing in the 1977 BBC COUNT DRACULA.  It's a funny thing, but when Mel Brooks played Van Helsing, I think it was Finlay's version he wound up being closest to.
ip icon Logged

bowers

  • Global Moderator
message icon
Re: Watcha Watchin'?
« Reply #1470 on: November 18, 2012, 09:00:53 PM »

It was definitely a Baskerville week for me- both the Peter Cushing and Ian Richardson versions were shown this week. Hadn't seen the Cushing version in years- great version, even a bit adult for the times. I do think Christopher Lee was just a bit too old to play the Baskerville role, however. Still, a very enjoyable film. I hadn't seen the Richardson version and was pleasantly surprised- very good telling of this story. I must say that I still prefer Brett's version a bit more. Also saw "Sherlock Holmes" on the  SyFy Channel. Another Asylum cheapie, this one was done with the Steampunk crowd in mind. Couldn't make myself watch the whole thing, but some of the VSF mechanical devices were kind of fun to watch. Cheers, Bowers
ip icon Logged

profh0011

  • Global Moderator
message icon
Re: Watcha Watchin'?
« Reply #1471 on: November 19, 2012, 03:49:41 AM »

Sy Weintraub, who did TARZAN from later Gordon Scott to to Jock Mahoney to Mike Henry to Ron Ely (!!!) got the rights to SHERLOCK HOMES, not long before the character went into public domain.  He planned 6 expensive tv-movies, but only got 2 made before the Granada series was announced.  I love both, but of late, I find the 2 Richardson films more fun to watch.

I feel the 2 versions of HOUND that are the most similar are the Tom Baker & Jeremy Brett versions.  Baker had a smaller budget, but, I feel, a better script, and vastly superior directing.  It's very energetic and the characters are all very compelling, while for whatever reason, the Brett version drags, is far too sombre, and worse, the directing and editing are abysmal, especially near the end.  I know many people love it, but each time I see it, it gets worse.  This really bothered me the first couple times, because, to me, Brett's 1st 2 seasons (26 episodes) were as close to prefection as you could imagine.  It was like, what the hell happened? 

I also much prefer the Richardson SIGN OF FOUR to the Brett version.

By the way, one of my favorite bits in the Richardson HOUND is when Watson goes out to confront the tramp.  "Wait a minute-- I KNOW that song!" "...well it DOES sound better on the violin."  Richardson's Holmes is just so good-natured, you can tell he loves his work.  He actually reminds me a lot of an older version of Ronald Howard from the 50's.

The film itself has always struck me as a remake of the Rathbone version; note Beryl meets Henry in both on horseback, etc.   Comparing multiple versions, the dialogue in the Richardson film has been dumbed-down for Americans, and many parts of the story have been re-arranged, etc.  I do like how they leave the truth about Beryl until the very end (you only find out she's married after her husband has been killed).  Probably the ony part I'm not too thrilled with is the portrayal of Lestrade (Ronald Lacey).  Brian Blessed gets a fabulous bit of acting in, considering his character is mentioned but never actually appears in any other version of the story. I never even recognized "Laura Lyons" as Connie Booth from FAWLTY TOWERS! Although her character is murdered in thois one, she survives in the Baker & Brett versions.  Baker has a GREAT scene in his where he tells her she's had a "VERY narrow escape".
« Last Edit: November 19, 2012, 03:57:13 AM by profh0011 »
ip icon Logged

profh0011

  • Global Moderator
message icon
Re: Watcha Watchin'?
« Reply #1472 on: November 21, 2012, 02:27:24 AM »

The perfect follow-up to GUNFIGHT AT THE OK CORRAL...

THE DEVIL'S DISCIPLE !

My favorite Burt Lancaster film, my favorite Kirk Douglas film, and, my favorite Laurence Olivier film!

It's slightly edged out as my favorite Guy Hamilton film by EVIL UNDER THE SUN.
ip icon Logged

Captain Audio

  • VIP
message icon
Re: Watcha Watchin'?
« Reply #1473 on: November 22, 2012, 07:11:46 AM »

Does anyone remember a Rathbone Holmes where a dismembered headless torso is found and identified by a tattoo?
I haven't seen this film in forty years and can't remember the title. Its not a Conan Doyle story, though probably has elements of "the Musgrave Ritual".
ip icon Logged

paw broon

  • Administrator
message icon
Re: Watcha Watchin'?
« Reply #1474 on: November 22, 2012, 08:40:36 PM »

Couldn't figure out which film it might be but a look at this should jolt the memory:-
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sherlock_Holmes_Faces_Death

We tried the final series of The Killing, the Danish police thriller, but after the first 2 episodes decided there were too many plot errors and we got a bit fed up with the story, so, that's that.  But apart from that mostly Only Connect:-
http://www.bbc.co.uk/programmes/b00lskhg
The most fiendish quiz on the telly, and not a prize in sight. And the lovely Victoria Coren presents.
American football and re-runs of Body of Proof.
ip icon Logged
Pages: 1 ... 57 58 [59] 60 61 ... 137
 

Comic Book Plus In-House Image
Mission: Our mission is to present free of charge, and to the widest audience, popular cultural works of the past. These are offered as a contribution to education and lifelong learning. They reflect the attitudes, perspectives, and beliefs of different times. We do not endorse these views, which may contain content offensive to modern users.

Disclaimer: We aim to house only Public Domain content. If you suspect that any of our material may be infringing copyright, please use our contact page to let us know. So we can investigate further. Utilizing our downloadable content, is strictly at your own risk. In no event will we be liable for any loss or damage including without limitation, indirect or consequential loss or damage, or any loss or damage whatsoever arising from loss of data or profits arising out of, or in connection with, the use of this website.