This is what I wrote in my original post.
The comics have already had a female Black Panther, so that is what I expect.
Totally against African tribal traditions, I believe, but they don't really care about Africa.
I wasn't referring to female soldiers or fighters, but female rulers, as in the European king or queen.
Thanks for the reference material. I always like to learn something new.
On the Dahomey Amazons.
I quote,
The female corps was formed in the mid-17th century from a small group of elephant hunters established by the second king of Dahomey, Wegbaja.
in those days African tribes usually had no army. In case of war, they would gather their warriors, fight the battle and disband the army
So in that instance, while there was a formidable female army, it was established by, and answerable to, a male king.
The two links on matriarchy reflect current western-oriented attitudes toward West Africa, which are highly slanted against European presence in West Africa, since what they are really interested in is damming western society.
So we get this.
Lerone Bennett writes in his Before Mayflower; a History of Black America, that the European penetration and the slave trade debased much of that which was vital and in African culture.
But the Muslim arabs were regularly taking slaves across the continent to the Sudan and then across to Arabia and points further west.
Slavery was and still is a cultural norm in Africa.
Black Slavery exists today in Muslim-dominated African nations https://www.israelnationalnews.com/news/353018Slaves and Slavery in Africa: Volume One: Islam and the Ideology of Enslavement (Slaves & Slavery in Muslim Africa) https://www.amazon.com/Slaves-Slavery-Africa-Ideology-Enslavement/dp/0714631426The Origins of the African Slave Tradehttps://scaruffi.com/politics/slavetra.htmlI apologise for going off topic but I can't let that pass. I know, probably not your opinion.
The articles on Matriarchy are biased and politically motivated.
Here are two contradictory articles by an African Feminist.Pre-colonial Africans were also patriarchshttps://www.judicaelleirakoze.org/pre-colonial-africans-were-also-patriarchs/Patriarchy in Ancient Africahttps://www.judicaelleirakoze.org/patriarchy-in-ancient-africa/ Take an effort to read them. Worth it.
Ranavalona I is a fascinating character but like queens Elizabeth and Victoria, untypical.
This article, from Wikipedia of course, is classic.
Conclusion:-
Later academic research recast Ranavalona's actions as those of a queen attempting to expand her empire while protecting Malagasy sovereignty against the encroachment of European cultural and political influence
Well, of course 'later academic research' did!
Lets ignore:-
She made heavy use of the traditional practice of fanompoana (forced labor as tax payment) to complete public works projects and develop a standing army of between 20,000 and 30,000 Merina soldiers, whom she deployed to pacify outlying regions of the island and further expand the realm. The combination of regular warfare, disease, difficult forced labor and harsh trials by ordeal using a poisonous nut from the Tangena shrub resulted in a high mortality rate among both soldiers and civilians during her 33-year reign, with Madagascar's population reducing from 5 million in 1833 to 2.5 million in 1839.
And how many of those forced labourers and those who died were women and children?
Also, as the article points out, Madagascar has cultural connections to the Indonesian Islands and is not typically African.
I have spent time in Ghana. Contrary to the perception most have, Ghana and the Gold coast countries are divided, Christian [much more so than most western nations] in the south and Muslim in the North.
Back to my original post, lets see if I can make myself clearer. My point was that Disney now uses its movies to promote values that are contrary to, not only a great percentage of its intended audience but also of the original creators of the characters and concepts, and that is what i expect of the new Panther movie.
The first film was a great hit, and not just in the US and understandably so. I don't have such high hopes for the next one.
Back to my original point.
Totally against African tribal traditions, I believe, but they don't really care about Africa.
I do not mean to imply a value judgement for or against patriarchy, just to point out that it was the traditional norm.
I stand by that statement.
Danke!