Two Hundred Sketches, Humorous and Grotesque (by Gustave Doré )https://comicbookplus.com/?dlid=84455This book was donated by
Lyons. In my opinion Lyon's contributions have enriched the Database immeasurably and he continues to do so.
The material Lyons uploads can not always be defined as comic books as the genre is generally understood, but they are always entertaining and informative as to the origins of comic books and the influences involved.
Going to wing it here, so If I get it wrong, please feel free to correct me.
The kinds of caricature Dore presents us with here, go back to the beginnings of art, but they really took off with the revolution that was printing.
With a printing press you have mass visual production, a broadsheet could be copied and be all over Europe in no time at all.
Eventually braodsheets became a vehicle for criticise those in Authority, eventually visuals were added and characature became a mainstay of social commentary.
I note that the cover of the book calls Dore a 'Graphic Designer'. Makes me wonder When that term was first coined. He was definitely that.
GrotesqueCambridge> "strange and unpleasant, especially in a silly or slightly frightening way"
Merriam-Webster > a style of decorative art characterized by fanciful or fantastic human and animal forms often interwoven with foliage or similar figures that may distort the natural into absurdity, ugliness, or caricature.
So, yes, these works are a superior example of that. But always for purpose, not just to mock.
The Hallmark is exaggeration.
Look at the frontispiece. Exaggeration of Heads, Bodies, Hats.
It occurs to me that Dore's work is the ancestor of
Will Elder and Harvey Kurtzman's work and maybe I should have chosen this one for the Reading Group.
Goodman Goes Playboy https://comicbookplus.com/?dlid=87963 I didn't, because I though it was too close to home, too contemporary.
Also, of course, the 'Underground' comics of the 60's and 70's.
And there
are narratives here, proto Comic books.
'Life in the provinces - history of an invitation to the country' for example.
Apart from the high standard of the art, it's clear that Dore is a critical observer of behaviors and a visual observer of whatever he sees and has the ability to put those elements together in a context that underlies his narrative intent.
Also, I'm struck with how many of his observations are still applicable today!
Human Nature doesn't change much.
cheers!