in house dollar bill thumbnail
Comic Book Plus In-House Image
 Total: 43,548 books
 New: 85 books




small login logo

Please enter your details to login and enjoy all the fun of the fair!

Not a member? Join us here. Everything is FREE and ALWAYS will be.

Forgotten your login details? No problem, you can get your password back here.

FBU: Public Domain Discussion

Pages: [1]

topic icon Author Topic: FBU: Public Domain Discussion  (Read 2785 times)

boox909

  • VIP
message icon
FBU: Public Domain Discussion
« on: November 08, 2010, 06:50:49 PM »

Our friends at Flashback Universe blog discuss the Public Domain Digital Slider, and other issues associated with comics book in the public domain.

http://flashbackuniverse.blogspot.com/2010/11/public-domain-digital-slider.html

B.
ip icon Logged

narfstar

  • Administrator
message icon
Re: FBU: Public Domain Discussion
« Reply #1 on: November 09, 2010, 02:01:34 AM »

So has it been determined that DC did not renew Bob or Jerry? They also had Pat Boone and Pinky Lee, Honeymooners, Dobie Gillis, Alan Ladd and more. Have these been checked for renewals? Janus is wanting a PD status checker. I am curious about Dell Comics and what they may not have renewed.
ip icon Logged

NobbyNobbs

  • VIP
message icon
Re: FBU: Public Domain Discussion
« Reply #2 on: November 14, 2010, 02:48:28 AM »

Did Dell actually have the copyrights to any of the comics they "published" before the split with Western Publishing/Printers, or did Western have the rights?
ip icon Logged

bchat

  • VIP
message icon
Re: FBU: Public Domain Discussion
« Reply #3 on: November 15, 2010, 04:40:15 AM »


So has it been determined that DC did not renew Bob or Jerry? They also had Pat Boone and Pinky Lee, Honeymooners, Dobie Gillis, Alan Ladd and more. Have these been checked for renewals? Janus is wanting a PD status checker. I am curious about Dell Comics and what they may not have renewed.


I checked-out "The Adventures of Bob Hope" online just because I wanted to, and found that issues 7-109 were renewed, with the Copyright Claimant being Bob Hope, not DC Comics.  I didn't see any renewals for issues 1-6.
ip icon Logged

narfstar

  • Administrator
message icon
Re: FBU: Public Domain Discussion
« Reply #4 on: November 15, 2010, 11:11:02 AM »

Which means that we should have no problem carrying 1-6. DC surely would not get into it since they do not have the rights anyway. I believe scans are out there to post after we are all good. I suspect maybe Dean and Jerry are all OK.
ip icon Logged

josemas

  • VIP & JVJ Project Member
message icon
Re: FBU: Public Domain Discussion
« Reply #5 on: November 15, 2010, 02:09:54 PM »


Did Dell actually have the copyrights to any of the comics they "published" before the split with Western Publishing/Printers, or did Western have the rights?



According to a piece that Mark Evanier wrote it was Western  who held the rights to almost all of the properties that appeared in Dell comics.   Of course since most of Dell's comics were licensed properties those rights were mostly just licensing rights and the copyrights were retained by whomever they were licensed from (Disney, MGM, Warner Brothers, Lantz, etc..). 
In actuality Western only ended up with copyrights to the few original series created by them for publication under the Dell imprint (such as Turok). 

Best

Joe
ip icon Logged

josemas

  • VIP & JVJ Project Member
message icon
Re: FBU: Public Domain Discussion
« Reply #6 on: November 15, 2010, 02:38:57 PM »


Which means that we should have no problem carrying 1-6. DC surely would not get into it since they do not have the rights anyway. I believe scans are out there to post after we are all good. I suspect maybe Dean and Jerry are all OK.


I wouldn't be surprised if those early Martin and Lewis comics were PD also.  I know that virtually all of Martin and Lewis' 1950s television appearances are now PD although both Dean and Jerry were much better about keeping their later solo efforts protected.

Best

Joe
ip icon Logged

narfstar

  • Administrator
message icon
Re: FBU: Public Domain Discussion
« Reply #7 on: November 15, 2010, 03:41:20 PM »

If one of the public domain experts could check on the DC character books we might be able to add several to the site. I would bet that many would be willing for us to carry their books anyway. Anyone know how to get hold of Pat Boone?
ip icon Logged

bchat

  • VIP
message icon
Renewals
« Reply #8 on: November 15, 2010, 08:50:22 PM »

The Adventures of Dean Martin and Jerry Lewis # 1-27, 29 & 37: Copyright renewal filed by Paramount Pictures Corporation
Pat Boone 1-3, 5: renewals filed by Cooga Mooga Products, Inc
Jackie Gleason and The Honeymooners 1-12: renewals filed by DC Comics
The Adventures of Alan Ladd 1-9: renewals filed by DC Comics

The Many Loves of Dobie Gillis 1-26: No renewals found online
Pinky Lee 1-5: No renewal found online

UPDATE:
The Adventures of Bob Hope 1-6:  I just ran across the renewals for these issues filed by Bob Hope.


KEEP IN MIND that just because I didn't find any renewals doesn't mean the books are Public Domain.  I might have typed something wrong while searching online or temporarily zoned-out while looking at a page.
« Last Edit: November 15, 2010, 08:54:21 PM by bchat »
ip icon Logged

narfstar

  • Administrator
message icon
Re: FBU: Public Domain Discussion
« Reply #9 on: November 15, 2010, 11:13:20 PM »

thanks for the info bchat. Now we need someone with contacts to get a hold of some of these individuals or corporations and see if we could get permission to carry the books as career advertisements. We all know that more exposure increases ancilliary value
ip icon Logged
Pages: [1]
 

Comic Book Plus In-House Image
Mission: Our mission is to present free of charge, and to the widest audience, popular cultural works of the past. These are offered as a contribution to education and lifelong learning. They reflect the attitudes, perspectives, and beliefs of different times. We do not endorse these views, which may contain content offensive to modern users.

Disclaimer: We aim to house only Public Domain content. If you suspect that any of our material may be infringing copyright, please use our contact page to let us know. So we can investigate further. Utilizing our downloadable content, is strictly at your own risk. In no event will we be liable for any loss or damage including without limitation, indirect or consequential loss or damage, or any loss or damage whatsoever arising from loss of data or profits arising out of, or in connection with, the use of this website.