A good friend of mine in Wales is a huge Anderson fan. He knows so much about several of his shows inside and out, far more than I do. He also feels that FIREBALL XL5 was his best-written show, and STINGRAY the last well-written one. I tend to agree... I even figured out exactly why THUNDERBIRDS wasn't as good as it should have been (and I love that show). But my friend, oddly enough, has never seen TERRAHAWKS or SPACE PRECINCT, both of which had some of the best writing I've ever seen in an Anderson show. It got frustrating because I couldn't even make copies of my tapes to send him, due to the difference in broadcast systems between the US and UK.
I came to the conclusion that Gerry & Sylvia getting DIVORCED must have had a really big effect on Gerry, as sometime after, the writing on his shows began to focus more on characters & less on technology.
Wasn't NOMAN an android or robotic body? CV was a set of clones (apparently kept in cold storage). What made Tiger Ninestein even more perverse was, apparently, his clones each were out in the world living their own lives, until one was needed, and then, they'd step into the machine, and effecively BECOME someone else-- more or less.
TERRAHAWKS was run very much out of sequence in the UK, and even worse in the US. I know that Tiger got killed in the 3rd episode, but apparently, in the UK, someone thought that was too disturbing, and held it back to run 39th (out of 39).
I owe it to Captain Audio for bringing up STAR COPS. It never occured to me before to compare the style and tone of those shows, and the O'Neil / Kirby comparison just jumped out at me. It would be hard to find 2 comics writers with more different attitudes in their work.
I suppose that means it's not really fair to try to compare the 2 shows on any kind of levels of quality. They're simply aimed at 2 completely different audiences (they just both happen to be sci-fi cop shows).