I guess I'm just a glutton for punishment... or something.
Last Friday, I had trouble keeping my eyes open... which is a real problem when you're trying to read subtitles. Well, today, I watched this again, with a couple of breaks to help keep myself going. And whatta ya know? I managed to get a pretty decent review for the
IMDB out if it!
CHALLENGE THE DEVIL (1963 / 1965)
Pre-Psychedelic Haunted House Romp *** (of 10)
6 drunken wastrels invade a seemingly-empty castle for a party, but find an old man who claims to have sold his soul to the Devil to prolong the life of the woman he loved. He offers them all the riches of the castle if they can find her now-dead body and give it a proper burial... but, this leads to what seems unending hellish torment, as the owner of the castle may be possessed by The Devil himself!
I came away from this feeling like it was at least 5 years ahead of its time, more the sort of movie some film-makers who'd done too much drinking, drugs & sex would have knocked out. The location work is very nice, there's lots of excellent, spooky photography, and the eerie music is very fitting. The problem is, the story itself would have probably have worked better as an episode of some TV anthology like "
THRILLER".
The history of the film is quite crazy. It actually started out at 90 minutes, but was then acquired by a different company, who cut 30 minutes out and then filmed 19 minutes' worth of entirely-new material as what seems a totally-unrelated framing sequence, with the original "haunted house" story presented in flashback! Even the 60 minutes of the "haunted house" seems too long and stretched out, which is a shame, as with a better script or MUCH-tighter editing, this might have had the making of something pretty cool.
I was actually reminded of no less than 3 later (and all better) films. First, "
DRACULA: PRINCE OF DARKNESS" (1966), for the way a group of idiots barge into Dracula's castle and find a table with food and drink already waiting for them (I wonder if THIS film might possibly have inspired that scene in THAT one?). Then there's "
HORROR HOUSE" (1969) with Frankie Avalon, which I saw on a big screen way back, and, the more-recent and rather infamous "
HALLOWEEN: RESSURECTION" (2002), with more idiots stumbling around a dark house. "
KATARSIS" (the original Italian name of this thing) makes more sense on that score, because it's easier to believe all this crazy stuff going on in a full-sized CASTLE rather than a mid-sized suburban house.
I'm sure the main draw here is Christopher Lee, who plays 3 different roles in under 10 minutes of screen time, but sadly was dubbed into Italian by another actor (and it appears this was never dubbed into English by anybody, so get ready to read subtitles-- heh).
It's really a schiophrenic experience, between the castle scenes, the "crime" plot added 2 years later, and the long nightclub scenes, which includes a pair of dancers, a cute singer (who oddly enough reminds me of a young Markie Post!) and an overweight and not-pretty solo dancer who's trying to blackmail someone. Sonia Scotti, the cute singer, who's completely out-of-place in the film, I would have asked out to dinner given a chance.
As part of "
The Eurocrypt Of Christopher Lee" box set,
Severin Films did a FABULOUS job on this deservedly-obscure film. As I used to joke about the Ralph Bakshi-produced episodes of "
SPIDER-MAN" (1968-70), this probably makes more sense if you're on drugs while watching it.
"
Bloody Disgusting" does a nice review of the
Eurocrypt box set.
bloody-disgusting.com/home-video/3651964/severin-films-unearthed-buried-gems-starring-christopher-lee-massive-blu-ray-box-set/