Wow! I'm impressed! Thank you!
Where a thoughtful comment can lead! Pleased that it led you to undertake that research!
I've often thought that some comic artists should be taken much more seriously as working artists than they generally had been.
Also, Given that Artists of the calibre of
Fine and Eisner could have made careers in more traditional ways, (like Portraiture for example) It shows that they clearly loved the form and deliberately chose to stay with it while it was economically viable to do so.
As you said earlier, it's a shame nobody to date has done a biography of Lou Fine.
As an aside, I was surprised that you seemed unfamiliar with the work of
George Evans. Since he never did Superheroes he is under the radar of many comics buffs.
The thing that impressed me was that his knowledge of aeroplanes was such that he criticized
Joe Kubert's Enemy Ace on the grounds that he depicted the wrong planes!
Here is a good Bio.
Artist Spotlight: George Evans https://www.jimkeefe.com/archives/10223 And here is a selection of his work
https://www.comicartfans.com/comic-artists/George_Evans.asp Much of which is to be found here on CB+
I am often disappointed by current comic book art, the tools and production techniques used today are superior to pre-SilverAge work, but there is a serious lack of style from many artists, [No, not all} and I can't see much evidence that the 'schools' they go to, teach them much about the great golden age artists, let alone the great strip artists.
Cheers and thank you!