Part 2!
Sam Hill Private Eye 1https://comicbookplus.com/?dlid=30403And no, I ddin't pay close attention to this before I posted it, just wanted a couple of examples of PI comics.
Robb said,
This book has a lousy front cover, littered with lots of text, and even big speech balloons with lots of dialogue, ruining the action scene that's supposed to catch the potential buyer's eye.
2 points.
Sure looks like they didn't have a cover ready go, so they got an interior illustration - or one that was meant for an interior - and filled up space around it with dialogue. Very messy!
But also, covers with a lot of dialogue were not uncommon at that time. I don't know why, but there were many almost as cluttered.
Harry Lucy is a good artist and does his best with what he's given here, and that's not much to work with visually. So I'm assuming that he had this script dumped on him and had to do the best he could with it.
The dialogue gives us a Sam Hill who is not just hard-boiled he's arrogant and unlikable. Not a good start.
The dialogue and behavior between the 'Eye' and the 'Dame' is ridiculous and corny and like something out of Mad Magazine. The story is constructed reasonably but the plot is strictly by the numbers. The only positive about it is Harry Lucy's art. He put's a lot of energy into the panels.
And the author clearly wanted to place a scene in the story in which this tough detective belts his client with a hard blow from his fist
Ah, no. That's an open palm and she has tried to shoot him.
The Double Trouble Caper. Just what is the chronology for that first panel supposed to be?
The scenario and the climax are totally predictable.
In any case, it seems he should try to find a different sort of clientele.
In a private eye story the client finds
him, and that's why the 'eye' is perpetually broke. Beggars can't be choosers.
Yes, by today's standards the attitude to women and the 'violence' is over the top, and surprising for a comic in this period, but not untypical for the pulps. The whole thing is miscalculated.
The Mad Money CaperAgain. Cliche by the numbers story.
Don't know why he threw in the Bow and Arrow. Out of boredom. My feeling is, whoever scripted this had no feeling for this genre of story and went way over the top and exaggerated everything. The only thing that makes it bearable is Harry Lacy.
Read Crash's review. He's on the money!
Can't find it now, but memory says that someone asked something to the effect, 'Why is he talking to himself?'
That's a narrative in the first person, which was characteristic of the genre. Probably worked well on Radio too, but it was never used much in movies.
Cheers!