Let's see, the last few days...
DRACULA
MARK OF THE VAMPIRE
DRACULA'S DAUGHTER
SON OF DRACULA
HOUSE OF FRANKENSTEIN
Is it strange that after so many years, most of these just keep getting better? (Or, if not, just screwier?)
Strange but true... MGM wanted to do an unauthorized adaptation of DRACULA. They almost got sued over it, so the script got heavily re-written and became LONDON AFTER MIDNIGHT. A few years later, they decided to do their own "vampire" movie in response to DRACULA, and recruited both Tod Browning and Bela Lugosi, but this time, Universal almost sued them over similarities, so they changed it (but not quite that much) to a semi-remake of LONDON AFTER MIDNIGHT. Having just watched DRACULA and MARK OF THE VAMPIRE back-to-back, it's mind-numbing they still didn't get sued anyway! So many characters, situations, and even bits of dialogue, nearly-identical. If it wasn't for the "twist" ending, MARK... might be looked at as nothing but a rip-off of the Universal film. I wish the silent film still existed, because while MARK... is technically very well-done, story-wise, I can't shake the feeling LONDON... may have made more sense. (I've got the "restoration", but as it consists of still photos, it takes a lot of concentration to get thru it and follow the plot.)