(1) Thought I'd give the reading group a go. I love the comics here, so why not talk with people about them?
Catholic comics #10
Now this is interesting. A standard "variety" comic but with a Catholic theme. Starting off with a sports story. It's a good thing the final was against a non-denominational school. Otherwise both teams would be praying and nobody would have an edge! Artwork is nothing special, but it gets the job done.
(2) Pudgy Pig is your standard funny animal story. Apparently this is a Charlton book, drawing from their library of material for side content?
I like the big splash page of the procession in the Father O'Malley story. Is it just me, or (3) are big panels like that rare in comics of this era? I suppose the artist felt they had a good subject for it.
(4) Why does the stork in the Aesop's Fable segment have fangs?
Skipping ahead a little, (5) we have a six page advertising section by the BF Goodrich Company. Catholic Comics must have been a little desperate for material! Just like the BF Goodrich company was desperate for materials to take the place of rubber. Rain coats, bathtubs, pipe coatings, lamp shades, is there anything Koroseal can't do? Koroseal Koroseal Koroseal. Apparently it is actually good at coating chemical tanks and things, seems like that's the main application today. But BF Goodrich did not get to realize their dream of replacing modern life with the stuff.
Musk-Ox men: I love when the artist was clearly pressed for time. It leads to delightful panels like that on page 43, where the caption specifies an extremely common type of two-engined aircraft, but the art shows a single engined monoplane. (6) There wasn't a paratrooper story or Army Air Corp book you could reference from? Also on page 43, I assume "fish net underwear" refers to something different from the modern term, but I have no idea how I'm gonna look it up! Maybe it was just a very fabulous Arctic expedition.
Sir Galahad: ah, here we have the tale of medieval chivalry depicted on the cover! Thank goodness, I was getting worried. Looks like this was an ongoing feature in this book. Merlin is among the antagonists? Now that's odd. The art is nice in this one, very good details on the faces and clothes. Probably my favorite art in the whole book. Medieval comic art almost seems to have its own sub-style, with Prince Valiant being the most famous example.
Treasure Chest of Fun and Fact V 17 No 2
Oh we are deep in the cold war this time! Starting off with a letter from J. Edgar Hoover himself! I think my favorite part of "This is Godless Communism" is how surprised everyone seems. "What? The Communists closed the church? How could we have predicted?!?" It seems like everyone who's ever designed a "Communist USA" flag, from 60s comic writers to 2010s strategy gamers, has come up with the exact same "hammer and sickle and stripes" design. Nice art though. I've seen Crandall's work before via the archive of Blackhawk comics on this site.
...I dunno what Chuck White and friends are up to. Going to Alaska to farm? That would not be my first choice.
(1) Welcome EHowie! Glad to have you aboard! The more participants, the more possibility for more interesting posts to mull over, and might lead to unexpected tangents where we learn a lot we wouldn't otherwise have, or get entertained more than otherwise.
(2) Yes, absolutely! Catholic Comics was drawn, formatted, at least partially written, printed, packaged together, at least partly, if not mostly, edited by Charlton personnel, with perhaps a last-look screening by Catholic Comics non- Charlton owners, for approval, and some features came directly from non-Catholic Charlton back stock. Catholic Comics were distributed by Charlton. They had their own office inside The Charlton Building (main building), and it seems likely that Charlton or individual Charlton owners (including John Santangelo) had, at least a partial stake in that educational book publishing company. Charlton copyrighted "Pudgy Pig", and used him in their normal comedy and funny animal books BEFORE he was used in "Catholic Comics", and he had his own Charlton secular comedy series, which started 9 years after Catholic Comics finished its run.
(3) No. I would say that big splash panels were NOT rare, but rather common during the early, mid, and late 1940s. That was a regular trademark of most of the earliest comics-packaging studios, including those of Will Eisner, Jerry Iger, Bernard Bailey, Lloyd Jaquet (Funnies,Inc.), Jason Comic Art (Leon Jason), Fox Features, Quality Comics, D.C., Timely, and many more (moreso than during the 1950s - I would say. But because I have almost no experience with Superhero series, it would be good to read others' comments on this question of yours.
(4) Clearly, the person who drew "Aesop's Fables" was a 7-year old (based on the look of the artwork), and he also didn't know much about the anatomy of a stork (we often had stork mothers nesting on roofs in my neighbourhood in Den Haag!). Maybe he was Santangelo's grandchild? (Charlton was known for trying to save on their operating costs bottom line by skimping on artists' salaries.
In any case, the artist had the stork use those front choppers to shovel the big frogs down his beak, towards the throat, indicating that frogs were stork's regular prey and dinner fare. So, it makes sense that they evolved for that function!
(5) I doubt that Catholic Comics was desperate for story or educational material (there was plenty around from which to choose. Clearly, they were desperate for the big money they could get from commercial concerns who would offer them big money to run thinly disguised adverts for them.
(6) As I stated above, Charlton was notorious for having the lowest pay scale for artists in the industry, yet they often had ridiculously short deadlines. That, unfortunately, cut out devoting almost any time to story researching, except for saints, who would rather donate lots of their own, unpaid time, to making sure the product they turned out was good, or, at least, halfway decent. I seem to recall comments by others that Jack Kirby was one of those. Carl Barks was one of those, and he never worked for stingy Charlton, or low-paying Fox, or one of the other lower pay scale publishers.
As to "fishnet underwear in the 1940s, I recall that some men wore double layer underwear, whose outer layer was a tighter-weaved fabric(cotton), but there was an inner layer that was fishnet style, through which air could pass, and therefore it could breathe. My father and some of my uncles wore it, but I never did. It would have been too hot for me. We had coal heat in winter, and my grandparents and parents kept the house too hot for me at about 55 degrees F (which, from what I've observed in homes of Americans, would have been considered bone-chilling temperatures to sleep in). I never was able to wear long underwear and sleep in it under blankets, even in the coldest Winnipeg Arctic winter.